Lhe staggering measure of seeking doctors from foreign countries has been made official. For the French Prime Minister to make the declaration before the national Parliament is a decision loaded with meaning; that this desire is carried out as a solution to the inadequacies of our medical training is an admission of a lack of respect for the development of health systems in the French-speaking world.
Because make no mistake: it is not our colleagues trained in major English-speaking universities who are expected, but rather future French-speaking doctors from countries historically linked to our medical culture. These doctors are trained mainly in faculties which, for decades, have made the effort to structure themselves at the level of international standards, with the public support of often deprived States, in the context of immense health needs of the populations of these territories. . And it is these practitioners coming from countries that were formerly called “developing” that France seems to want to put at its service.
What confirmation of the renunciation and negation of the medical cooperation policies that our country has pursued for more than fifty years; what an affront for those who deployed them and, more broadly, for our universities! In the apparent context of suspicion, if not rejection, regarding the heritage of our culture in countries marked by colonization, this announcement can only reinforce the feeling of distrust, including at the political scale, as the issue of health is a societal determinant.
Lack of forecast
The year 2024 will be marked by the holding in France of the summit of the International Organization of the Francophonie. More than eighty states and governments are represented there, but, despite this context, the preservation of the relationships essential for these partnerships has clearly not encouraged us to retain the official word and the negation it demonstrates against the needs health of these countries. So what are the values that the French language conveys in its dissemination space? Solidarity, respect, humanism? No argument can hold up in the face of the gravity of the image that is presented. Certainly, many of these doctors trained abroad ask to come and practice, and even settle, in France. But the regulation of a global system of training and exchange must be the highest consideration to prepare the future of all. And it is precisely consideration of the needs of our partners that must guide initiatives of this order. International mobility must be a source of professional identity training and not the object of a pre-emption of human resources.
You have 30% of this article left to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.